Bombshell Report! Sniper for Canadian Military: Trump Shooter Had “Inside” Help

Ready to uncover the truth? Sick of the lies? Join our Telegram Channel now. It’s time for the real story! My gratitude to all my readers!

Former Canadian military sniper Dallas Alexander has made explosive claims suggesting that the recent shooter who targeted Donald Trump may have had inside help. This revelation comes as a shock, igniting debates and theories about the involvement of powerful entities and the lengths they will go to eliminate those who stand in their way. Dallas Alexander, who served for 14 years in a sniper team, providing close protection for world leaders, including the Canadian Prime Minister, offers a unique and authoritative perspective on this alarming incident.

An Unsettling Event. On a day meant to be marked by a rallying cry for support, former President Donald Trump found himself in the crosshairs of an assassin. The suspect, Thomas Matthew Crooks, managed to get dangerously close, firing shots before being neutralized by security. The ease with which Crooks navigated the event raises several red flags, prompting questions about the security measures and potential involvement of higher powers.

Dallas Alexander Speaks Out

Dallas Alexander didn’t mince words when he voiced his concerns. His experience and insight provide a chilling backdrop to his statements:

“I’m very familiar with the layout of these types of events and what the job should be, and I saw what happened yesterday. I have no doubts in my mind that the shooter had help from somewhere within an agency, an organization, or the government.”

Alexander’s assertion suggests a level of coordination and access that is not easily attainable by an average individual. The fact that Crooks was able to get shots of Trump before being taken down implies a breach of security that can only be orchestrated with insider assistance.

The Chilling Implications. If Dallas Alexander’s suspicions hold water, we are looking at a conspiracy that reaches the upper echelons of power. This isn’t merely about an individual with a grudge; it’s about a calculated move to eliminate a political figure who has consistently challenged the status quo. The term “Deep State” has often been thrown around in political circles, but Alexander’s allegations give it a tangible and terrifying face.

Security Breach or Coordinated Attack? To fully grasp the gravity of the situation, we need to examine the details of the event. The security at such high-profile gatherings is typically tight, with multiple layers of protection. How did Crooks manage to breach these defenses?

Lax Security or Complicit Guards? One possible explanation is that there was a significant lapse in security protocols. However, considering the nature of the event and the person being protected, this seems highly unlikely. More plausible is the theory that someone within the security detail or associated agencies facilitated Crooks’ actions.

SEE ALSO: ENERGY LIBERATION ARMY⚠️(WARNING)⚠️ Energy Liberation Army Review – Energy Liberation Army Works?

Inside Help: A Plausible Theory. Dallas Alexander’s insights point towards a disturbing possibility. The level of precision and the timing of the attack suggest that Crooks had detailed information about the event layout, Trump’s movements, and the best vantage points for an attack. Such information is not readily available to the public, indicating a breach from within.

Coordinated Effort or Rogue Operative? The question then arises: Was this a coordinated effort by a larger entity, or was it the work of a rogue operative within the system? Both scenarios are equally concerning. A coordinated effort would imply a level of organization and influence that is capable of orchestrating such an attack without detection. On the other hand, a rogue operative suggests that there are individuals within the system with the autonomy and intent to carry out such an act independently.

The Deep State:The term “Deep State” refers to a body of people, typically influential members of government agencies or the military, believed to be involved in the secret manipulation or control of government policy. While often dismissed as a conspiracy theory, events like the attempted assassination of Donald Trump give credence to the idea that there are shadowy forces at play.

Donald J. Trump: “If You Want Peace, Prepare For War. . .” How True Patriots Can Defend Their Family and Faith from This Latest Attack from The Deep State

The concept of the Deep State is not new. Historically, many political assassinations and coups have been attributed to hidden hands working behind the scenes. From the assassination of John F. Kennedy to the ousting of foreign leaders, the fingerprints of a deep-rooted and clandestine organization have often been speculated upon.

In today’s context, the Deep State is often associated with efforts to undermine or control political figures who challenge the established order. Donald Trump, with his unorthodox approach and willingness to confront entrenched powers, has been a prime target for such entities.

The Motive: Why Trump? Understanding the motive behind the attack on Donald Trump requires a deep dive into his political journey and the enemies he has made along the way. From the moment he announced his candidacy, Trump positioned himself as an outsider, a disruptor of the political status quo. His promises to “drain the swamp” and his combative style earned him both fervent supporters and powerful enemies.

SEE ALSO: MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY AGAIN! HOME RETREAT | HOW TO RENEW YOUR CELLS IN 7 DAYS

Trump’s policies, particularly his stance on immigration, trade, and foreign relations, have often been at odds with the interests of established power structures. Additionally, his personality and approach to politics – brash, direct, and often controversial – have made him a polarizing figure.

For those entrenched in the power corridors of Washington, Trump represents a threat to their influence and control. His willingness to question and dismantle long-standing practices and alliances has put him in direct opposition to those who benefit from the status quo.

The Attack: What Really Happened?

On the fateful day, Thomas Matthew Crooks managed to infiltrate a highly secure area and fired shots at Trump. The sequence of events leading up to and following the attack offers critical insights into how it was possible.

Crooks’ Background. Thomas Matthew Crooks was not an unknown entity. His background, affiliations, and movements in the days leading up to the attack are crucial to understanding how he executed his plan.

The Day of the Attack. Detailed analysis of the day’s events reveals several anomalies in the security setup. From unexplained gaps in surveillance to the suspiciously coordinated movements of Crooks, every detail points towards the involvement of an insider.

The Aftermath. In the aftermath of the attack, the immediate response by security forces was swift, but questions remain about the initial breach. The official narrative focuses on Crooks as a lone wolf, but the evidence suggests otherwise.

Inside Help: Identifying the Culprits

If we accept Dallas Alexander’s assertion that Crooks had inside help, the next step is to identify the potential culprits.

Complicit Agencies. Which agencies or organizations had the means and motive to assist in such an attack? The list includes intelligence agencies, security firms, and even elements within the government.

Rogue Operatives. Identifying individuals within these agencies who could have facilitated Crooks’ actions is a challenging but necessary task. These operatives would have access to critical information and the ability to manipulate security protocols.

The Cover-Up. One of the most telling signs of inside help is the subsequent cover-up. Efforts to downplay the incident, misdirect public attention, and suppress critical information all point towards a coordinated effort to hide the truth.

The media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception. In the case of the Trump shooter, the narrative presented by mainstream media has significant implications.

• #1 Most Hated By Big Pharma – Rogue Doctor Fixes Type 2 Diabetes

Media bias and selective reporting can obscure the truth. Analyzing the media coverage of the attack reveals a pattern of misdirection and downplaying critical aspects that point towards inside help.

In contrast, independent journalists and alternative media outlets have been instrumental in uncovering details that mainstream media overlooks. Their efforts are vital in ensuring that the truth is not buried under a barrage of biased reporting.

The Need for a Thorough Investigation. Given the gravity of the allegations made by Dallas Alexander, there is an urgent need for a thorough and independent investigation into the events surrounding the attack on Donald Trump.

Transparency is crucial in rebuilding public trust. An independent investigation must be conducted with full transparency, holding those responsible accountable for their actions.

Beyond accountability, it is essential to address the systemic issues that allowed the attack to happen. Strengthening security protocols and ensuring that those tasked with protection are beyond reproach is vital in preventing future incidents.

Conclusion: The Fight for Truth and Justice

The attempted assassination of Donald Trump is more than just an isolated incident; it is a wake-up call to the dangers posed by hidden forces within our systems of power. Dallas Alexander’s bold claims shed light on a dark reality that we cannot afford to ignore.

The fight for truth and justice is ongoing. It requires vigilance, courage, and a relentless pursuit of transparency. As we unravel the layers of this conspiracy, one thing becomes clear: the battle against the Deep State is far from over, and the stakes have never been higher.

Content Redistribution Policy