BOOOM! GOOGLE LEAKS THREAD: Leaked Internal Google Documents Show Collusion to Suppress “Right Wing” News and Information and Partnership With Clinton Campaign During 2016 Election
Medeea Greere, an independent publisher, is now on Telegram at https://t.me/AMGNEWS2022 and exists only on reader support as we publish Truth, Freedom and Love for public awareness. Thank You for your support!
The morning after the [2016] election, [Google] employees cried, lost their minds, and planned their resistance.
Google’s war on information and accuracy began in the run up to the 2008 election – Obama. Anything critical of Obama was pushed down the search results or scrubbed.
In 2008, Geller Report (then Atlas Shrugs) began reporting on Google’s systematic attack on truth and accuracy. We were shadowbanned (or as I then called it sandboxed) in 2008 with the Obama birth certificate scandal.
The response back then to Google bans and censorship healthy – it was vigorous and loud. And Google was forced to respond. We were, in large part, shouting into the void. No one stopped them. Few on the right thought it was an existential threat.
They spent the next decade perfecting it. But it was was the election of Donald J. Trump that proved to be the tipping point for left wing giant’s take down of American freedom.
In 2019, 950 pages of Google’s internal documents leaked, providing evidence of Google’s use of blacklists and machine learning algorithms to censor conservatives and populists.
In 2019, 950 pages of Google’s internal documents leaked, providing evidence of Google’s use of blacklists and machine learning algorithms to censor conservatives and populists.
YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki described how Google uses “machine learning” and “classifiers” to bury “trashy news” and promote “authoritative news.” Machine learning is when algorithms are fed real-world information and learn to make decisions based on the patterns they find.
Corporate media journalists have failed you.
When it comes to fact-finding, one anonymous Twitter account is doing his due diligence to expose the intel community infiltrating Big Tech.@NameRedacted247 joined @EmeraldRobinson to break down his viral Twitter threads. pic.twitter.com/1bnIzEclsf
— The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson (@AbsoluteWithE) January 27, 2023
Many of the concepts that his research pioneered are used by Twitter to subconsciously swing election results.
Google receives 5.6 billion daily searches, controlling 90% of global search traffic.
YouTube has 2.3 billion users.
Our beliefs are inseparably linked to search results, but Google is a biased source of information, and the tech platform actively manipulates what we see.
#13 YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki described how Google uses "machine learning" and "classifiers" to bury "trashy news" and promote "authoritative news."
Machine learning is when algorithms are fed real-world information and learn to make decisions based on the patterns they find. pic.twitter.com/E28q5leaEO
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#14 What were these classifiers?
Here's a leaked document, "Fringe ranking/classifier."
Google ranked ABC, CBS, and CNN as more “authoritative” than the “trashy” Fox News and Breitbart.
This is how Big Tech manually interjects political bias into search results and algorithms. pic.twitter.com/rb2EO5FkJy
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1620195663580626945?s=20&t=loG9Ilr7uV5c8Y9Wu7xkEA
#2 Google receives 5.6 billion daily searches, controlling 90% of global search traffic.
YouTube has 2.3 billion users.
Our beliefs are inseparably linked to search results, but Google is a biased source of information, and the tech platform actively manipulates what we see. pic.twitter.com/assAbrmlpo
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#3 In 2021, former Google software engineer Zachary Vorhies (@Perpetualmaniac) published a book where he explained that the turning point was the election of @realDonaldTrump.
The morning after the election, employees cried, lost their minds, and planned their resistance. pic.twitter.com/BHOK5VXnZa
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#4 Google co-founder, Sergey Brin, said in an all-hands company meeting, "I certainly find this election deeply offensive, and I know that many of you do too.”
"Many people apparently don't share the values that we have." pic.twitter.com/KKyX8ulZ2S
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#5 Kent Walker, Google's Chief Legal Officer, suggested Trump voters were motivated by "fear," "xenophobia," and "hatred."
He described how the company would take on the rise of "populism" and "nationalism." pic.twitter.com/ROGqdZRVhP
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#7 The Clinton campaign’s chief technology officer, Stephanie Hannon, and chief product officer, Osi Imeokparia, came from Google.
Two other key Clinton campaign staffers, Derek Parham and Jason Rosenbaum, also previously worked at Google.https://t.co/xnsLL5FxvI
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#8 Google paid for free rides for a get-out-the-vote for Hispanic voters operation — and employees called it a “silent donation” to Hillary Clinton's campaign in internal emails because they thought it would help her win.https://t.co/N231DsHRmG
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#9 Tech employees are notoriously aligned with the political left, with 96% of Google’s employees donating to Democrats during the 2018 U.S. midterm election. pic.twitter.com/LVR1t5bhA6
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#9 Tech employees are notoriously aligned with the political left, with 96% of Google’s employees donating to Democrats during the 2018 U.S. midterm election. pic.twitter.com/LVR1t5bhA6
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#9 Tech employees are notoriously aligned with the political left, with 96% of Google’s employees donating to Democrats during the 2018 U.S. midterm election. pic.twitter.com/LVR1t5bhA6
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#10 From Vorhies’ perspective, when Google launched a crusade against so-called “fake news,” what it meant, in actuality, was censoring the ideas and arguments of @realDonaldTrump and his populist supporters.
Anything “pro-Trump” or "anti-Hillary" was labeled as "fake news." pic.twitter.com/HlHubK6Qrm
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#15 They define a few fringe searches and mention humans training their censorship AI, followed by a flow chart that says, "People are programmed."
These are the type of source documents @elonmusk should release to show how Twitter promoted specific ideas and suppressed others. pic.twitter.com/bazIVCc4SY
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#17 Vorhies released a YouTube blacklist that showed hundreds of topics censored from search results:
•Las Vegas Shooter
•Sandy Hook
•GOP Train Crash
•Heritage Foundation
•Anthony Bourdain Murder
•Kate Spade Suicide
•Pro life
•Late Term Abortions
•Crisis Actors pic.twitter.com/uE1UIfAJQY— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#18 Google's CEO, Sundar Pichai, and VP Karan Bhatia, had previously testified to Congress that the company wasn't "manually intervening" or "utilizing blacklist" in search results.
Based on Google's own internal documents, Sundar Pichai and Karan Bhatia lied to Congress. pic.twitter.com/u3LUiCfcbv
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#18 Google's CEO, Sundar Pichai, and VP Karan Bhatia, had previously testified to Congress that the company wasn't "manually intervening" or "utilizing blacklist" in search results.
Based on Google's own internal documents, Sundar Pichai and Karan Bhatia lied to Congress. pic.twitter.com/u3LUiCfcbv
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#19 A study found that Google cost Republican candidates over $2 billion in donations since 2019 by flagging 77% of their fundraising emails as spam.
During the same time, Gmail marked less than 11% of Democrat fundraising emails as spam.https://t.co/lJ1TrIQxeN pic.twitter.com/4XJCg5wMvt
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#20 @elonmusk should consider allowing Dr. Robert Epstein to examine the #TwitterFiles.
He's a Harvard-educated researcher, the former editor-in-chief of "Psychology Today," and the premier academic studying how tech giants use algorithms to manipulate behavior.@JanJekielek pic.twitter.com/SJUi5PZLaJ
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#22 @DrREpstein's research over the last decade has documented how Google, Facebook, and Twitter shift millions of votes without anyone noticing.
Many of the concepts that his research pioneered are used by Twitter to subconsciously swing election results. pic.twitter.com/uaQFjzxmjm
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023
#23 In summary, @elonmusk should release source documents on blacklists and machine learning algorithms used to stifle free speech.
Giving access to an expert like @DrREpstein would help show the world how a handful of silicon-valley executives manipulate the minds of billions. pic.twitter.com/JfLAZV5S46
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 30, 2023