Breaking Report: Trump’s “DECLARATION OF AUTHORITY AND SUMMONS” — Common Law Strikes Back, “US Inc.” Is Dead, and the Republic Rises Again

A document attributed to President Donald J. Trump declares a return to Common Law sovereignty and the death of “US Inc.” — the corporate shadow government. This dossier dissects every clause: lawful command, sovereign right, military summons, restoration of independence, and binding duty. A new Republic narrative — pro-Trump, pro-people, unstoppable.
WHAT WE’RE FACING: A DECLARATION, A PROVOCATION, A PROMISE
A document is circulating. It’s printed with a seal and a signature, titled Declaration of Authority and Summons, and it contains five sweeping clauses that claim to reconfigure the relationship between the President, the military, and national sovereignty.
Let’s be crystal clear up front: we do not assert that this text is an officially published executive order. We treat it as a declaration attributed to the President that is circulating online. Our analysis does not hinge on bureaucratic nuance — it rests on the moral and strategic force of the idea: if this text were enforced, it would amount to an institutional revolution.
This document speaks the language of the people: order, sovereignty, summons, restoration. It is, bluntly, a prosecutorial blueprint against institutions that have substituted the popular will. For supporters, it is not polite rhetoric—it is the beginning of decisive action.
“LAWFUL COMMAND UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE (UCMJ)”
(lawful command — the first shot: the military serves the Constitution, not bureaucracy)
The text states: Every flag officer … is bound to obey the lawful orders of the Commander-in-Chief. Translation: regardless of rank or legacy, military leaders are subject to constitutional orders. Period.
Bloody analysis:
This is the legal hammer: it reasserts the fundamental rule many career generals seem to have forgotten — the military is not a state within a state.
It is a direct rebuke to officers who confuse institutional loyalty with political loyalty. If you have forgotten to whom you swore an oath, this reminds you: obey the Commander-in-Chief.
For the people, this is a promise: no more untouchable generals. For Trump supporters, it restores civilian supremacy over force.
Conclusion: clause one is not rhetoric — it is a weapon. It puts pressure on generals who exercised “autonomy” and says plainly: orders come from the people, through the President.
Attention: How does Melania Trump stay beautiful? All the First Lady’s beauty secrets REVEALED!
“SOVEREIGN RIGHT UNDER COMMON LAW”
(sovereign right — reclaiming the nation’s legitimacy)
The text invokes a sovereign prerogative rooted in precedent: the head of state may summon military leaders for counsel, recognition of authority, and re-ordering of national defense. The right is declared inherent and incontestable.
Bloody analysis:
This plays to the feeling of sovereignty: the idea is simple and brutal — a truly sovereign state can convene its military leaders and reset the nation’s defence.
Terms like “common law” and “prerogative” are chosen to lend historical and juridical weight — this is not populist fluff; it is legal-historical muscle.
For citizens who feel robbed by parallel institutions (bureaucracies, unaccountable agencies), this line reads as restitution: the re-vestiture of power.
Conclusion: clause two is a political declaration: if a government asserts its sovereignty, it can reconfigure internal order. It strikes at the parallel government.
“SUMMONS TO ASSEMBLY”
(summons to assembly — calling the officers to Virginia on a set date)
The document summons all flag officers to assemble in Virginia on a specific date — a formal mobilization, not a consultation.
Bloody analysis:
This is the most tangible move: not just principles but an executable act. You mobilize senior leaders. You demand affirmation and reaffirmation of loyalty.
Symbolically, it is powerful: generals called into public view, forced to choose between their oath and their hidden loyalties.
Practically, it would force a public clearing: who holds power, and who concedes.
Conclusion: the summons is the test of courage. It reveals who is loyal and who is compromised.
“RESTORATION OF SOVEREIGNTY”
(restoration — closing or transferring military outposts established under foreign dominion)
The text goes further: it orders that all military outposts and operations abroad established under British Commonwealth or foreign dominion shall be lawfully closed or transferred, securing America’s independence in full.
Bloody analysis:
This is the major strategic strike — closing bases, transferring operations, cutting ties to foreign dominion. It promises a wholesale reset of U.S. global posture.
For sovereignty-minded supporters, this is nirvana: no more hidden foreign strings, no more external jurisdictions diluting independence.
Strategically, it removes pretexts for illicit operations run under the cover of alliances or mandates.
Conclusion: clause four promises to end architectures of external influence that have bound American policy. It’s decisive, radical, and final.
“BINDING DUTY”
(binding duty — oath, honor, the supreme obligation)
The final paragraph reaffirms the President’s sacred duty to uphold the Constitution, protect the people, and preserve the Republic. It declares all officers bound by oath, honor, and law to obey.
Bloody analysis:
This closes the moral and legal circle — from order to consequence.
It frames compliance not as optional conscience but as a legal and honorable duty.
For the public, it sets the stage for accountability: noncompliance becomes not only a political failure but a breach of sworn duty.
Conclusion: clause five is the ethical verdict — those who fail their oath will be punished. For voters, it feels like justice in action.
REAL IMPACT — WHAT APPLICATION WOULD MEAN
If partially or fully enforced, the consequences would be seismic:
Restored civilian supremacy: the President reclaims clear control over the military and senior officers who mistook duty for autonomy.
Institutional purge: removals, dismissals, inquiries, loss of privileges for politically compromised officers.
Geopolitical reset: a review and reconfiguration of bases, operations, and partnerships that enabled unmanaged external influence.
Domestic mobilization: supporters feel vindicated; bureaucratic institutions recoil — either bowing to oath or resisting.
Crisis potential: such moves provoke media storms, bureaucratic pushback, and possible friction in the ranks — but for a nation seeking reconstruction, the rupture may be necessary.
CONCLUSIONS — WHAT WE WANT AND WHAT WE WOULD GET
This circulating declaration is more than paper: it is a map for reconstructing sovereignty. You can love or hate it, but the rhetorical force is undeniable. It provides a plan: remind officers of their oath, summon accountability, restore sovereign order.
For the pro-Trump public, this signals that action—real, uncompromising action—is contemplated. For the architects of the parallel state, it sounds like a trial.
The message is clean and brutal: constitutional order returns, and traitors will pay — in honor, rank, and privilege.
CALL TO THE PEOPLE
If you want order, demand clarity: push institutions to honor their oaths, insist on public summonses and transparent reviews, and demand verification. The people have the right to know who serves them and who serves another agenda.
This circulating document forces a choice: believe in sovereignty or accept control. Choose.
BOOOM: “WE WILL NOT SUBMIT” — Secretary RFK Jr. TORCHES UN Health Treaty That Demands Digital Surveillance and Corporate Dictatorship [VIDEO]
RFK Jr. just nuked the UN’s Health Declaration — rejecting global digital surveillance, biometric control, and corporate mandates. America will not kneel. Trump’s White House backs him. This is war.
A GLOBAL COUP DISMANTLED IN 4 WORDS: “WE WILL NOT SUBMIT”
RELATED: SURVEILLANCE ALERT: Bill Gates Unveils ‘Global Digital ID’ to Erase Non‑Compliant Humans From Society — The Surveillance State Is Here [VIDEO] https://amg-news.com/surveillance-alert-bill-gates-unveils-global-digital-id-to-erase-non%e2%80%91compliant-humans-from-society-the-surveillance-state-is-here-video/










![BREAKING: For the 13TH Time, Senate Democrats REFUSE to Pay the Troops and Reopen the Government — AGAIN. Schumer Kills Clean GOP Bill as Federal Workers Turn on Democrats [VIDEO]](https://amg-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/For-the-13TH-Time-Senate-Democrats-REFUSE-to-Pay-the-Troops-and-Reopen-the-Government-450x253.png)



8 Comments
WHY is there NO date on this document?
Where is the proof on the government site…why didn’t Trump put it on X? He loves informing people that way. Why is this called a Declaration instead of an Executive Order?
I wonder if he will feel the same when the sovereign states stand up and nullify unconstitutional laws, mandates, EOs (did you know that an EO can only pertain to members of the Executive Branch in order to administer laws passed by Congress???), treaties, international agreements, rules, regulations. The states have more power under the Constitution than the federal government. The states delegated just 18 powers to the federal government and they can be found in Art. 1 Sec. 8 of the Constitution. If it ain’t there it belongs to the states. Of course they twist everything in the Constitution and the dumbed down American people go along instead of finding the truth for themselves. Truth is that when our elected violate the Constitution it is the right and the duty of the states to nullify…..which means: REFUSE TO COMPLY
The USA, incorporated (foreign owned) is still going strong under Trump. They are not “the Republic,” they’re British Territorials (Tories). Americans just don’t know their history.
On October 1, 2025, the USA Inc and Maritime law were dissolved. Our Republic was restored, and Common Law is now restored.
I guess you don’t know current history.
Well Tony-the U.S. Inc. has been dissolved,and we are running under the Republic. They are not of course-but they have nothing left either.-and no wheres near as strong as they were. Trumps visit over to England just recently wasnt just for Tea and Crumpets..did I hear something about them in the beginnings of turning into a Republic also…?
This entire thing about America being incorporated is just another ploy by desperates to gain clicks and your money.
I wonder if anyone understands anything about this stupid Truman Show of endless psyops and computer-generated clown characters? What’s going on with our world right now? Who’s running this whole circus? Who’s writing this entire TV series?