BREAKING: SCOTUS Halts End of Trump-Era Policy, Gives Biden 24Hrs To Respond

BREAKING: SCOTUS Halts End of Trump-Era Policy, Gives Biden 24Hrs To Respond

Medeea Greere, an independent publisher, is now on Telegram at https://t.me/AMGNEWS2022 and exists only on reader support as we publish Truth, Freedom and Love for public awareness. Thank You for your support!

Democrat Joe Biden has zero respect for the calamity his open border policies have caused the American people, especially the ones who are most impacted by the massive humanitarian disaster and law enforcement crisis that is unfolding.

Biden’s administration is attempting to dismantle even the slightest bit of rational immigration procedures on the border by seeking to lift a safeguard that has been in place since President Donald J. Trump was in charge.

Biden’s legal team doesn’t want anyone prevented from coming into this country illegally and disappearing into the countryside undetected.

The government is currently in front of the US Supreme Court to argue that the states impacted by the federal government’s out-of-control enticements to the entire third world- to come to the US and live off of our country, have no right to be concerned about more illegal aliens moving into their towns and committing crimes.

Here are some more details of what is happening as it impacts the border and illegal immigration, as reported Yahoo News:

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Monday temporarily stopped the expiration of the immigration restriction Title 42, which was scheduled to lift on Wednesday after 19 states filed an appeal.

Roberts’ brief order did not discuss the merits of the case. The administrative stay gives the justices enough time to consider the states’ appeal in light of the looming deadline for Title 42 to end.

Roberts ordered responses to his order to be filed by Tuesday.

The states had asked the Supreme Court to intervene and keep Title 42 in place — contending that not doing so “will cause a crisis of unprecedented proportions at the border.”

“Getting rid of Title 42 will recklessly and needlessly endanger more Americans and migrants by exacerbating the catastrophe that is occurring at our southern border,” Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said in a statement. “Unlawful crossings are estimated to surge from 7,000 per day to as many as 18,000.”

The policy known as Title 42 started in 2020, under President Donald Trump, in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic and has since been used to expel migrants from the southern border more than 2.4 million times on the basis of public health concerns.

Due to the rapid nature of the expulsions, which usually take place in a matter of hours, access to asylum and other humanitarian protections is sharply curtailed.

The American Civil Liberties Union and other advocates have been waging a legal battle against the order, claiming it violates federal and international law.

In Monday’s application for a stay, the states, which are mostly Republican-led, again argued that lifting Title 42 will create an influx of unauthorized migrants who will unduly burden government services like law enforcement, education and health care.

Border Patrol made a record 2.2 million apprehensions along the southern border this past fiscal year. Meanwhile, the Biden administration removed 1.4 million people under both Title 42 and the standard immigration authority, Title 8.

The states also maintained that the federal government is essentially trying to have it both ways on the controversial policy — what the states call “collusion and contradiction” — because the government first defended Title 42 earlier in the litigation and then switched sides and supported the lower court decision to strike it down.

Last month, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that Title 42 was “arbitrary and capricious” and that its public health impact was minimal.

The outlet continued with more details:

Sullivan set a Wednesday deadline to end the protocols.

The justices could agree to hear the appeal by granting a writ of certiorari. There is no set timeline for this.

The appellate ruling last week was unanimous — and procedural. The lower court judges found that the states became involved too late in the process, given their purported alarm.

“In this case, the inordinate and unexplained untimeliness of the States’ motion to intervene on appeal weighs decisively against intervention,” the panel wrote, noting that the lawsuit had been pending for almost two years.

“What I can tell you is we are required by a court order to lift Title 42. That’s Dec. 21. And we’re going to comply with that,” she said.

In a statement last week, after the appeals court ruled against the states, White House spokesman Abdullah Hasan said that the administration “will continue to fully enforce our immigration laws and work to expand legal pathways for migration while discouraging disorderly and unsafe migration.”

“To be clear: the lifting of the Title 42 public health order does not mean the border is open,” Hasan said then. “Anyone who suggests otherwise is doing the work of smugglers spreading misinformation to make a quick buck off of vulnerable migrants.”

In a statement on Monday following the stay, the Department of Homeland Security said, in part: “The Title 42 public health order will remain in effect at this time and individuals who attempt to enter the United States unlawfully will continue to be expelled to Mexico.

“While this stage of the litigation proceeds, we will continue our preparations to manage the border in a safe, orderly, and humane way when the Title 42 public health order lifts.”

The department urged Congress to approve more funding for the border.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article may not represent the official views of Medeea Greere or the American Media Group. Stories filed under Opinion contain information from various sources that may be both, verified and unverified. Medeea Greere and the American Media Group do not make any claims as to the validity of the information expressed in the opinion section, however we do encourage the reader to do further research on their own and we hope that you will share your findings with us. The mission for the truth requires a collective effort.

SOURCE

Content Redistribution Policy