BREAKING: U.S. SET TO STRIKE IRAN — WHILE MEDIA SCREAMS “TRADE WAR,” BOMBS ARE BEING PREPPED

Now I will write about the hypersonic missile with nuclear application Oreshnik (Орешник ).
Oreshnik is Russian for Hazelnut.
And as for the missile itself, it has already been tested in combat conditions in Ukraine in Dnepropetrovsk, then the Yuzhmash plant was destroyed, along with the underground with a depth of up to 20 meters.

And now, if it is tested again, the “Iron Dome” in Israel – Jerusalem will be completely destroyed, in response, if Israel and the USA lead to the destruction of Iran.

If then the missiles fall on Russia, the next target for Oreshnik will be Diego Garcia, and possibly also the base in Taiwan, and if they fall on Russia, the next step will be an attack by Russian Oreshnik, Avangard, Zircon, Iskander-1000 missiles on the USA.
And here are all the scientific data on the Oreshnik missile that the scientist Gordon Duff has made.

Gordon Duff

Introduction: A Weapon That Shifts Global Power

Russia’s Oreshnik missile does not merely represent a leap in military technology; it is the embodiment of a strategic doctrine designed to dismantle the foundations of NATO’s security and reshape global power dynamics. The Oreshnik is the crown jewel of Russian defense innovation, joining the ranks of groundbreaking systems like the Satan II intercontinental ballistic missile, the Poseidon nuclear torpedo, and the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle. Yet, it stands apart for its ability to deliver devastation on par with nuclear weapons while sidestepping the restrictions and stigmas tied to weapons of mass destruction.

When the Oreshnik was unveiled, it sent shockwaves through the Western military establishment. With a single missile capable of carrying 36 one-ton kinetic penetrators, each traveling at over Mach 11, it can obliterate the most fortified targets. Its destructive force surpasses that of conventional nuclear bunker busters, with penetrators releasing energy equivalent to asteroid impacts. Hardened facilities like NATO’s Cheyenne Mountain, submarine pens, and underground missile silos—once thought impenetrable—are reduced to molten ruins in the face of this unparalleled power. From airbases to energy grids, command centers to critical infrastructure like the Channel Tunnel, no target is safe. The Oreshnik ensures that wherever it is deployed, it renders defense futile and recovery impossible.

President Vladimir Putin’s decision to prioritize the Oreshnik signals a calculated shift in Russia’s military doctrine. Reports suggest that in a conventional war with NATO, Russia would deploy multiple Oreshnik missiles per day, targeting Europe’s military and civilian infrastructure with surgical precision. The entire Baltic and Mediterranean Seas could fall under Russian dominance, with NATO ships unable to operate, ports annihilated, and vital shipping routes severed. Strategic chokepoints like the Rhine and Danube rivers could be blocked by destroying key bridges and dams, causing flooding and paralyzing regional economies. The missile’s deployment could paralyze Europe in a matter of days, crippling its economy, disrupting its command and control, and undermining the morale of its populations. Even the Swiss underground tunnels, once considered untouchable sanctuaries, could be obliterated by the Oreshnik’s kinetic force, leaving no safe haven for NATO leadership or strategic assets.

What makes the Oreshnik even more alarming is its legal and political positioning. Unlike nuclear weapons, it operates in a gray zone, bypassing international treaties while delivering destruction equivalent to a thousand-plane B-17 raid. Its non-nuclear classification enables its deployment without triggering global condemnation, making it an ideal weapon for coercion and escalation. In this legal ambiguity lies its greatest strength: a capability to blackmail adversaries without crossing the threshold of nuclear war.

Russia’s broader strategy reinforces the Oreshnik’s significance. While NATO exhausts its resources in Ukraine, Russia has adopted a measured approach, conserving its artillery and stockpiling millions of rounds for a potential larger conflict. This “rope-a-dope” strategy ensures that Russia is prepared to overwhelm a depleted and politically divided NATO. Meanwhile, Russia’s ongoing production of drones, hypersonic weapons, and advanced military systems underscores its readiness for prolonged and escalated confrontation. The decision to use minimal artillery in Ukraine signals an even more profound truth: Russia is holding its resources in reserve, preparing for a larger and more decisive conflict where weapons like the Oreshnik will take center stage.

The Oreshnik missile is not just a weapon; it is a statement. It announces that the age of secure bunkers, impenetrable defenses, and uncontested Western dominance is over. With this superweapon, Russia has redefined the rules of engagement, creating a reality where no adversary can feel secure and no conflict can be fought on even terms. As the West grapples with the implications of this new era, the Oreshnik looms as both a harbinger of destruction and a warning that the geopolitical landscape has changed irrevocably.

The Oreshnik Missile: Russia’s Superweapon and the End of Defense
Kinetic Power: The Science Behind Destruction
At its core, the Oreshnik missile utilizes one-ton titanium penetrators traveling at Mach 11 (approximately 13,000 mph). Each penetrator delivers an astounding 16.89 gigajoules of energy upon impact—equivalent to the explosive force of 4 tons of TNT. Deployed in clusters of 36, a single missile releases over 607 gigajoules, rivaling the destructive capability of a tactical nuclear weapon without the political and environmental fallout associated with nuclear arms.

This raw kinetic energy transforms the Oreshnik into an unparalleled instrument of precision destruction:

Military Installations: A single strike could vaporize parked aircraft, destroy fuel depots, and incinerate command centers. Secondary explosions from munitions and fuel stores would amplify the devastation, rendering airbases inoperable for decades. Strategic hubs like Cheyenne Mountain—long considered invulnerable—would be reduced to molten debris, their hardened walls collapsing under the relentless kinetic force.
Naval Targets: The kinetic energy of a one-ton penetrator at Mach 11 would obliterate aluminum-hulled destroyers, vaporizing their structure and scattering fragments across the ocean floor. Even heavily armored aircraft carriers would succumb to the combined heat and shockwave, ensuring the neutralization of entire naval fleets with a single strike. Ports themselves, integral to resupply and operations, could be rendered useless by craters and debris.
Urban Centers: Kinetic strikes in populated areas would collapse buildings, ignite uncontrollable fires, and create craters capable of engulfing entire city blocks. The psychological toll would be devastating, instilling fear, chaos, and uncertainty within civilian populations. In addition to structural damage, the intense heat and shockwaves could vaporize individuals within the immediate vicinity, while causing severe burns and lung damage to those miles away.
Critical Infrastructure: Strategic assets like the Channel Tunnel or bridges spanning the Rhine could be annihilated with surgical precision. Collapsed structures would block major waterways, severing vital trade routes and triggering cascading economic crises. The destruction of gas storage facilities or chemical plants would result in secondary explosions and toxic plumes, compounding the human and environmental toll. Nuclear power plants struck by such penetrators would face catastrophic meltdowns, spreading radiation across vast areas.
Underground Fortifications: With the capability to penetrate hundreds of meters underground, the Oreshnik can destroy deeply buried bunkers, nuclear silos, and command centers. Even the most hardened facilities would offer no refuge, leaving leadership and strategic assets exposed. The sheer force of impact would collapse tunnels, destroy critical communication lines, and neutralize any potential for continued operations from these facilities.
The human cost of such an impact is equally harrowing. Temperatures exceeding 6,000 Kelvin in the immediate vicinity would incinerate all organic material, while the pressure waves would rupture organs, collapse lungs, and cause instant death for those within range. Survivors in the periphery would suffer catastrophic injuries, including burns, blindness, and internal trauma caused by secondary projectiles and collapsing structures. Compared to conventional weapons like the TOS-1A flamethrower, which relies on thermobaric effects, the Oreshnik delivers a far more concentrated and widespread level of destruction, combining heat, shock, and sheer kinetic force to devastate targets across multiple dimensions.

The science behind the Oreshnik’s destructive potential is rooted in the dynamics of hypersonic impacts. The combination of speed, mass, and heat creates effects akin to small asteroid strikes, delivering unimaginable devastation. These impacts generate localized temperatures comparable to the surface of the sun, vaporizing materials on contact and sending shockwaves through the surrounding environment. It is as though the target is momentarily touched by a small sun, leaving no chance for survival or recovery in its immediate vicinity. The collateral effects—from fires to structural collapse—magnify the destruction, creating zones of devastation that defy traditional recovery efforts.

The implications are not merely tactical but strategic. The Oreshnik does not just destroy physical assets; it cripples an adversary’s ability to sustain prolonged conflict. Its deployment would leave nations paralyzed, economies shattered, and societies gripped by fear, marking a decisive shift in the nature of warfare.

Plasma Fields: A Shield Against Interception
The Oreshnik missile’s advanced plasma-field technology represents a revolutionary leap in modern weaponry, turning the missile into both a shielded spear and a strategic nightmare. Plasma, often described as the fourth state of matter, consists of ionized gases in which free electrons and ions coexist. This state is highly responsive to electromagnetic fields, enabling unique properties that traditional materials and weapons systems cannot replicate.

At hypersonic speeds, the Oreshnik generates an intense plasma sheath as air molecules surrounding the missile are ionized by frictional heat. This sheath, akin to an electromagnetic cocoon, grants the missile unprecedented defensive and offensive capabilities:

Missile Defense Systems Neutralized: Traditional missile defense systems, such as the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and the Aegis-based Standard Missile-6 (SM-6), rely heavily on radar and infrared detection to track and intercept incoming threats. The plasma field surrounding the Oreshnik absorbs radar waves and scatters infrared signatures, effectively cloaking the missile from detection. Furthermore, the missile’s trajectory within the atmosphere ensures that even fleeting detection becomes irrelevant due to its rapid and unpredictable maneuvers.
Invisibility to Lasers and Kinetic Interceptors: Directed-energy weapons, such as lasers, fail to maintain the focused energy necessary to penetrate the plasma field. The heat and ionization levels rival temperatures found in nuclear reactions, vaporizing any interceptor that approaches. Similarly, kinetic energy weapons designed to collide with incoming threats are rendered ineffective. The Oreshnik’s plasma sheath dissipates impact energy and shields the missile from external damage, ensuring its payload reaches its target unimpeded.
Unpredictable and Adaptive Trajectories: Unlike ballistic missiles that follow predefined arcs, the Oreshnik is equipped with advanced maneuverability. The plasma sheath enhances this by reducing aerodynamic drag and allowing the missile to adjust its trajectory mid-flight. This adaptability ensures that interception becomes an exercise in futility, as defensive systems cannot predict or react to its movements in real-time.
Plasma, Gravity, and Kinetic Sorcery
The Oreshnik’s plasma technology is rumored to extend beyond radar absorption and heat shielding. Advanced theories suggest that the missile’s plasma field may create localized electromagnetic anomalies, disrupting communication and guidance systems within its vicinity. Drawing from principles explored in electromagnetic wave distortion and gravitational manipulation, these effects align with cutting-edge research, including the work of Mehran T. Keshe, who has theorized the use of plasmas in propulsion and shielding technologies.

James Clerk Maxwell’s foundational equations, which describe the behavior of electric and magnetic fields, underpin the understanding of these phenomena. By manipulating these fields at hypersonic speeds, the Oreshnik achieves what was once thought impossible: a weapon that not only avoids interception but actively disrupts the systems designed to counter it.

Historical records suggest that certain advancements in plasma and electromagnetic research, especially during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, were deliberately suppressed. Some researchers argue that these hidden technologies could have laid the groundwork for free energy and advanced propulsion systems akin to those theorized for “flying saucers.” By leveraging these principles, the Oreshnik’s plasma field bridges the gap between theoretical physics and applied military dominance.

A Weapon of Strategic Reckoning
The implications of the Oreshnik’s plasma-field technology extend far beyond the battlefield. By rendering NATO’s missile defenses obsolete, it exposes critical vulnerabilities in Western strategic planning. The reliance on layered defense systems—designed to intercept traditional ballistic arcs—has left NATO ill-prepared for a weapon that evades detection, adapts in real-time, and nullifies existing technologies.

The Oreshnik’s plasma technology doesn’t just disable defensive systems; it challenges the very framework of deterrence. Hypothetical scenarios paint a grim picture: an Oreshnik missile targeting an aircraft carrier group in the Mediterranean would render NATO’s naval strategy paralyzed. A single strike on critical urban infrastructure, like power grids or satellite command centers, could create cascading effects, disrupting civilian life and military operations alike.

This technological superiority forces a fundamental reassessment of defensive doctrines. As the Oreshnik redefines the rules of engagement, it challenges the very concept of deterrence, shifting the balance of power irreversibly. NATO and its allies now face the grim reality that their most advanced systems are no match for this weapon, leaving them scrambling to adapt to a new era where offense dominates and traditional defense strategies crumble.

The psychological impact of such an unstoppable weapon cannot be overstated. Civilians and military personnel alike are left with the sobering realization that no conventional defenses can shield them. As nations rush to respond, the Oreshnik stands as both a technological marvel and a harbinger of a new, uncertain era in warfare.

Geopolitical Implications: A Weapon of Influence
The Oreshnik’s significance extends far beyond the battlefield, emerging as a geopolitical tool that Russia could wield to destabilize NATO, reassert global dominance, and challenge Western hegemony. By leveraging its unprecedented capabilities, the Oreshnik alters the strategic calculus of modern warfare and diplomacy.

Strategic Deployments: The missile’s covert operational potential allows it to be launched from a diverse range of platforms, including container ships hidden within civilian fleets, fishing trawlers, or submerged submarines. Such mobile launch systems enable the Oreshnik to strike without warning, positioning it near adversary shores—whether the Gulf of Mexico, the Arctic, or even neutral waters off Europe. This stealth deployment renders NATO’s assets perpetually vulnerable, forcing member states into heightened states of alert that strain resources and morale. The constant threat amplifies the strategic and psychological burden, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty and fear.
Export to Allies: The Oreshnik’s versatility and devastating potential make it an attractive asset for Russia’s allied nations, many of which are eager to challenge Western influence. By equipping countries like Venezuela, Iran, or Yemen, Russia could drastically shift regional power dynamics. For instance, a Yemeni-operated Oreshnik could dismantle naval blockades in the Red Sea or target critical installations in adversarial nations, reshaping the balance of power in the Middle East. Similarly, deployments in South America could bring NATO’s southern flank under unprecedented pressure.
Economic Blackmail: The Oreshnik’s reach extends to the most critical arteries of global commerce. By targeting chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal, or vital European rivers such as the Rhine, Russia could paralyze trade routes, causing cascading economic disruptions. Imagine a single strike severing the Rhine’s trade flow—blocking the transport of goods to major industrial centers—or collapsing infrastructure along the Danube. The economic chaos would ripple worldwide, forcing adversaries to negotiate from a weakened position. The threat of such disruption alone grants Russia immense leverage in both diplomatic and economic affairs.
Psychological Impact: Beyond its physical capabilities, the Oreshnik’s mere existence wields psychological power. Knowing that this unstoppable weapon can be deployed anywhere, at any time, undermines the collective resolve of NATO member states. Public confidence in military defense diminishes, while internal divisions within NATO deepen, as nations prioritize national security over collective defense commitments. The resulting fragmentation weakens alliances, leaving adversaries to operate with greater freedom. This psychological warfare component complements the missile’s physical destructiveness, creating a multidimensional threat that is as much about perception as reality.
Historical Context and Ethical Questions: The Oreshnik’s emergence echoes other transformative weapons in history—from the advent of nuclear arms to stealth technology. However, unlike nuclear weapons, the Oreshnik lacks the same political and environmental stigma, making it a more deployable option in conflicts. The proliferation of such weapons raises urgent ethical questions. Would Russia export the Oreshnik to unstable regimes, knowing it could be used for coercion or rogue attacks? What safeguards, if any, exist to prevent its misuse? These questions remain unanswered, deepening the unease surrounding the missile’s strategic implications.
The Long-Term Strategic Vision
Russia’s decision to prioritize the Oreshnik reflects a calculated assessment of global power dynamics. By developing a weapon that is unstoppable in its current form, Russia not only gains a formidable deterrent but also a potent tool for coercion and influence. The Oreshnik’s dual-purpose functionality—capable of destroying critical infrastructure while destabilizing adversarial alliances—positions it as a centerpiece in Moscow’s broader strategy to counter NATO and assert dominance in a rapidly evolving global landscape.

This weapon’s existence forces NATO to confront an uncomfortable reality: traditional defense paradigms are no longer sufficient. The Oreshnik represents a shift in power, where offensive capabilities dominate and the lines between military strategy and geopolitical influence blur. As adversaries scramble to adapt, the Oreshnik’s shadow looms large, signaling a new era of warfare defined by technological superiority and strategic unpredictability.

Unanswered Questions and Future Potential
While the Oreshnik is a technological marvel, it raises critical questions about its future evolution and strategic applications:

Extended Range: Could the missile be adapted for intercontinental strikes, enabling it to target any point on the globe? This extension would make it a true global threat, removing any sanctuary from potential targets and altering the calculus of international defense.
AI Integration: Advanced guidance systems could allow the Oreshnik to autonomously prioritize and adapt to dynamic battlefield conditions. By incorporating artificial intelligence, future versions could identify critical targets in real-time, navigate complex air-defense environments, and optimize trajectories for maximum impact, further enhancing its lethality and unpredictability.
Submersible Launch Platforms: Future iterations could be launched from submerged platforms, such as modified submarines or underwater drones. This capability would drastically increase their stealth and strategic reach, allowing for deployment near adversarial shores without detection.
Container Ship Deployments: Imagine a dozen container ships of benign origin, each armed with a battery of Oreshnik missiles, innocently plying the waterways of Asia, the Gulf of America, or cruising off Europe’s Atlantic coast. These vessels, disguised as ordinary cargo freighters, would operate unnoticed under the guise of legitimate commerce. Container-based launch systems are not a hypothetical concept; they are already a reality in modern warfare. With no existing radar or defense systems capable of tracking launches from these directions—and minimal satellite coverage—the Oreshnik’s covert capabilities would leave global military powers exposed to near-instantaneous destruction. Even detection would offer no meaningful defense against such a system. For a relatively modest investment, the entirety of global military capability could be rendered naked and vulnerable to an untraceable, unstoppable conventional weapon. Such deployments would transform global waterways into silent arenas of potential annihilation, making every coastline and every port a potential target.
Non-Military Applications: The same technology could be repurposed to target satellites or other space-based assets, opening a new front in the militarization of space. The ability to disable communications, surveillance, and navigation satellites would give Russia an unparalleled advantage in space warfare.
AI “Dead Hand” Integration: The Oreshnik could potentially be integrated into an AI-driven “dead hand” system, operating autonomously to execute retaliatory strikes. This prospect brings the concept of a Skynet-like automated warfare system closer to reality, with catastrophic implications for global stability.
These possibilities underscore the need for international arms control measures to address emerging technologies that defy traditional frameworks. The rapid evolution of systems like the Oreshnik threatens to outpace existing treaties, leaving the world vulnerable to a new era of unchecked militarization. The technological advancement it represents is not borne out of ingenuity alone but desperation—a reaction to escalating conflicts and deteriorating global stability. This is not innovation for its own sake but a permanent Sword of Damocles, the grim result of geopolitical brinkmanship and a failure to anticipate the shifting sands of military technology.

The Psychological and Strategic Fallout
The Oreshnik missile is more than a weapon of physical destruction; it is a psychological tool that undermines confidence in traditional defense systems. By exposing the futility of existing strategies, it forces NATO and its allies to confront their vulnerabilities and reconsider their reliance on outdated doctrines.

For civilian populations, the implications are equally dire. The knowledge that a single missile could devastate entire cities fosters a pervasive climate of fear and uncertainty. This erosion of morale weakens nations from within, as fear-induced paralysis undermines public confidence in government and military leadership. The psychological toll extends to policymakers, who must grapple with the reality that their nations’ defenses are inadequate against such a weapon.

The notion of “a tiny sun crashing down with ten minutes’ notice” becomes a Sword of Damocles hanging over nations, reshaping the geopolitical order. It demonstrates that military dominance is no longer about vast armies or expensive air-defense systems but about who can wield the most untraceable and unstoppable tools of destruction. The Oreshnik’s capacity to target critical infrastructure—ports, energy grids, bridges, or command centers—parallels lessons from Israeli targeting in Gaza and Lebanon. However, unlike conventional airstrikes, the Oreshnik ensures permanent, catastrophic damage.

The hypothetical deployment of container-based Oreshnik platforms, continuously traversing international waters, magnifies this fear. With NATO’s limited satellite coverage and ineffective tracking, even the knowledge of their existence destabilizes military strategy. These weapons create a world where no infrastructure is safe and no defense reliable.

Such scenarios evoke the grim specter of AI-driven autonomy, where automated launch systems could turn the world’s oceans into a chessboard of potential annihilation. The fear isn’t merely physical but existential—a realization that technological escalation has created a global landscape where safety and deterrence are illusions.

In the strategic sphere, the Oreshnik’s existence compels adversaries to invest heavily in countermeasures, diverting resources from other critical areas. The missile’s psychological impact magnifies its physical destructiveness, making it a multidimensional threat that reshapes the geopolitical landscape. For the neocon strategists in Washington, it represents a painful oversight—an unstoppable technological advancement they failed to anticipate, now leaving NATO and its allies exposed.

Amplified Reflection: The Road to the Oreshnik and Beyond
The Oreshnik missile emerges as the culmination of a trajectory that military experts and media censors have long concealed from public scrutiny. Like its forebears—the Poseidon torpedo and the nuclear-powered cruise missile—the Oreshnik’s strategic intent lies not just in its destructive capability but in the chilling message it delivers to an unprepared world. Both Poseidon, with its ability to unleash a 200-megaton tsunami towering 500 meters high, and the nuclear cruise missile, capable of stealthily creeping up the Pacific coastline to annihilate Los Angeles, represent prior leaps in military technology that seemed pulled from the pages of apocalyptic fiction.

The Poseidon, derided by some as too fantastical to be real, epitomized the madness of a weapon designed not to destroy cities directly but to drown them beneath walls of irradiated water. The nuclear-powered cruise missile—silent, enduring, and nearly impossible to intercept—was its quieter sibling, able to traverse continents undetected before detonating with surgical precision. Yet these advancements, deliberately hidden from public discourse by the marriage of media gatekeepers, social media narratives, and the war lobby, failed to provoke the global outcry they were intended to inspire. The arms control conferences that might have followed never materialized. Instead, this deliberate obfuscation has brought the world to the Oreshnik—another step in a grim escalation where innovation outpaces humanity’s capacity for restraint.

But the Oreshnik, as terrifying as it is, may not be the end of the line. The possibilities for what comes next are as harrowing as they are plausible. Imagine swarms of mosquito-sized drones, each loaded with Marburg or another weaponized pathogen. These micro-drones, undetectable and unstoppable, could infiltrate densely populated areas, spreading lethal contagions with terrifying efficiency. The concept isn’t a leap of science fiction—it is the logical next step in a world that prioritizes annihilation over diplomacy, fear over dialogue.

This isn’t just a technological arms race; it is an ethical collapse. The convergence of unchecked innovation, profit-driven war industries, and a complicit media apparatus has created a system that thrives on escalating threats while shielding the public from their implications. By denying visibility to these advancements, the military-industrial complex has ensured that the discourse remains one-sided: the weapons advance, but the conversations about their consequences remain stifled.

The failure to confront these advancements early has not only allowed them to proliferate but has also ensured that future technologies will emerge in an environment of even greater secrecy and apathy. The Oreshnik is a harbinger of this dark trajectory—a weapon designed to strip away illusions of safety, not just through destruction but through psychological dominance. Its deployment forces the world to confront the bleak reality of what unchecked militarism leads to: weapons so advanced that they render defense obsolete and survival a fleeting hope.

The public, shielded from these truths by a media system that serves the war lobby, remains unaware of how precariously the world balances on the edge of annihilation. Without transparency, without an engaged and informed populace, and without the willingness to confront the vested interests profiting from this madness, the descent will continue. The Oreshnik may be the weapon of today, but the swarms of drones, the bioweapons, and the AI-controlled arsenals of tomorrow will make even this nightmare seem quaint.

Conclusion: A Call for Accountability
The Oreshnik is more than a weapon—it is a mirror held up to humanity’s failure to address its own destructive tendencies. It reflects a system that prioritizes power over peace and secrecy over accountability. To halt this trajectory, the world must not only disarm but also dismantle the machinery of disinformation and profiteering that perpetuates it. Without such efforts, the Oreshnik will only be remembered as the precursor to horrors we cannot yet imagine.

Bibliography
Keshe, Mehran Tavakoli. The Universal Order of Creation of Matters. Keshe Foundation, 2009.
(Explores Keshe’s theories on plasma technology and its potential applications.)
Keshe, Mehran Tavakoli. “Iranian Nuclear Physicist Develops Innovative New Plasma Tech.” Markets Insider, November 7, 2023. markets.businessinsider.com
(Discusses Keshe’s recent advancements in plasma technology aimed at addressing global challenges.)
Smith, Jeff. Unthinking the Unthinkable: Nuclear Weapons and Western Culture. Indiana University Press, 1989. Internet Archive
(Analyzes the cultural and psychological dimensions of nuclear weapons in Western society.)
Smith, R. Jeffrey. “The Renegade General Who Believes Hiroshima Could Happen Again.” Politico Magazine, May 2016. POLITICO
(Profiles a military figure’s perspective on the persistent threat of nuclear warfare.)
Plasma Ecosystems. “Plasma Science and GANS Technology.” Accessed January 21, 2025. Plasma Ecosystems
(Provides an overview of plasma science applications as promoted by the Keshe Foundation.)
Keshe Foundation Wiki. “Keshe Foundation Plasma Technology Resolves the African Swine Fever Problem in China.” Accessed January 21, 2025. KFWiki
(Details the application of Keshe’s plasma technology in addressing agricultural challenges.)
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “R. Jeffrey Smith.” Accessed January 21, 2025. Carnegie Endowment
(Provides a professional overview of R. Jeffrey Smith’s contributions to national security journalism.)
Keshe Foundation. “About Mehran T. Keshe.” Accessed January 21, 2025. Keshe Foundation
(Offers a biography of Mehran Tavakoli Keshe and his work in nuclear engineering and plasma technology.)
Keshe, Mehran Tavakoli. “Mehran T Keshe Speaks on Plasma Energy Technology, Space Travel Explained & a World at Peace.” YouTube, uploaded by [Channel Name], [Upload Date]. YouTube
(Video presentation by Keshe discussing the implications of plasma technology.)
Veterans Today. “VT Nuclear Education: The Beirut Nuclear Coverup.” April 7, 2022. VT Foreign Policy
(Article featuring insights from Jeff Smith on nuclear events and their geopolitical implications.)
You Might Be Interested In
https://www.theinteldrop.org/2025/01/21/the-oreshnik-missile-russias-superweapon-and-the-end-of-defense/