CERN: Biggest Science Scam in History
Medeea Greere, an independent publisher, is now on Telegram at https://t.me/AMGNEWS2022 and exists only on reader support as we publish Truth, Freedom and Love for public awareness. Thank You for your support!
“NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE THING DOES – NO ONE DOES. FIRING PARTICLES AT EACH OTHER AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT CAN’T END WELL. WE (PHYSICISTS) HAVE NO IDEA WHAT WE’RE DOING.”— DR. AMIT GOSWAMI, QUANTUM PHYSICIST
Once you begin to understand how false flags are perpetuated on citizens of the world, whether they are local incidents like San Bernardino and Sandy Hook alleged shootings, or false flags of global implications like 9-11, you can uncover any false flag, no matter how small or big.
In our recent article False Flags and Legal Propaganda by the Department of Defense, we showed you how the United States government made it legal to commit propaganda on its citizenry through the expanded powers of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012. It is no longer treasonous to lie and trick Americans into believing anything that the shadow government wants in order to carry out its ultimate plan of world domination under one government and religion. Whether the agendas are gun control, war, or banking bail-outs, false flags use legal methods of deception used to persuade the sleeping masses that these agendas are necessary for their protection and National Security.
The next false flag that we want to point out to our fellow patriots is the international false flag called CERN. Once the curtain is lifted on this illusion, your fears that the world will implode into the abyss will be allayed; the main work being at CERN is related to the World Wide Web and has little to do with their stated mission. By seeing the full scope of the project, you can also start demanding more transparency for a so-called science operation that is sucking trillions of dollars and euros from citizens around the world.
As usual, our articles are not for fly-by readers. We try to be as thorough as possible so that you are fully armed with truth. The Third World War is an INFOWAR and in order to win, patriots must be armed with the truth.
Peeling Back the Veils of the CERN Illusion
Just as the first atom smashers were used to create bombs, everything done at CERN is for military purposes. As is usually the case, any technology that can be weaponized for the globalist’s take-over of the world, whether it is social media, big agriculture, energy production, or the internet, will be used for the purpose of enslaving humanity. Make no mistake: CERN is a super hub for the global military industrial complex. (To read more about the military industrial complex, see our links at the end of this article.)
Of course, we are not told this. A general internet search describes CERN as a very important scientific project that is in search of creation’s smallest particle—the God particle. But we also see strange religious messages mixed throughout our search such as the statue of Shiva outside of the CERN headquarters or bizarre videos of workers dancing the Hindu Shiva Dance of Destruction.
CERN workers perform Dance of Destruction
Untold billions (perhaps trillions) have been poured into the biggest system of machines (so we are told) ever made, relying on a “science” of theoretical physics that claims it can use human machines to “create” as God did during the first moments of creation. But you will be hard pressed to find any useful discoveries at CERN, even after decades of research and experimentation and boatloads of international funding.
Indeed, CERN has been in operation since 1954 and has yet to create anything useful or get a single step closer to its mission of proving the big bang theory. Of the many “supposed” projects and experiments underway right now, not one of them will lead to anything but theories that attempt to place scientist on the same level of God, or perhaps higher.
What is the Most Powerful Force on the UNIVERSE? Video below:
CERN is the Biggest Science Fraud in History
No one has been able to stop or thoroughly examine CERN experiments as it is sanctioned by a mysterious assembly of international associations where the ultimate authority of the project has been so hidden through Jesuit-like compartmentalization that you cannot find any one leader, CEO, or entity in charge. In fact, many scientists who are employed by CERN probably don’t know that it is a scam. They are just conducting their limited scope of work, which could be legitimate, given to them by a supervisor that is also working within constraints and boundaries. Everything is on a need-to-know basis.
In a process known as diffusion of responsibility, no one is ultimately responsible. In CERN’s case this means that science can do whatever it wants–whether it is creating light-speed atomic collisions, capturing mysterious “particles” that can create supernovas or black holes, genetic modification of plants, animals and humans, or just the standard militaristic warlord banker’s favorite — building new bombs for both sides of the conflict.
CERN gives scientists permission to have free reign to rip apart or explode anything they want just because they are trying to find the God particle.
The CERN scientific community makes the braggadocios statement that “Science can do what God does, or better!” With its community of 25,000 international scientists, scattered throughout the world, who are not responsible to any particular national law or regulation, diffusion of responsibility gives this group exclusionary power and immunity to decide which experiments are worthy of its endeavors, while protecting its scientists from any personal or group consequences.
It also hides the real purpose of CERN: It is the NWO super hub of the military industrial complex for the World Wide Web.
Why is CERN located in Switzerland?
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that if you want to build something secret and keep it secret, you might consider Switzerland where you can hide money, politics, and in this case, the very machine itself. Do we really believe that the Swiss, known only for manufacturing Swiss watches and knives, built the most complicated machine in the world?
If what you want is concealment to launder and hide boatloads of money, Geneva, home of internationalism and globalism (IMF, BIS, League of Nations, World Council of Churches, Swiss banks, etc.) is a perfect place to hide the scientific-financial-military hoax of all times.
Let’s review key points:
The Money – no one knows who all gives to CERN or how much money has been spent to date.
Think auditing the Fed is difficult to achieve, try auditing this international world wide web of lies! We know that the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Warburgs, and other warlord bankers privately donate huge sums that do not appear on CERN published budgets. There are confusing stories, multiple budgets, hidden assets and donations that are shared between seven different cities in France and Switzerland.
There are multiple supporting corporations and associations around CERN. One public budget alone shows over a billion a year is spent and nothing is produced except claims and simulations. The total amount donated to CERN have estimates that begin at 11 billion and range to 3 trillion.
You see why CERN is located in the secretive Swiss banking community? Can you imagine what it would take to get a full accounting of anything from CERN—whether financial or operational? Can you see how this provides the ultimate cloak of secrecy to the world’s biggest false flag?
One thing is for sure. Even though America donates the largest amount of yearly funding, all member countries share data that ensures the international war machine has plenty of weaponized technology for all sides.
In this way, perpetual war, spearheaded by the banking warlords, is guaranteed and they all continue to make money on war—no matter which side is fighting.
Countries involved in CERN research include: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Romania, Serbia, Pakistan, Turkey, India, Japan, Russian Federation, United States of America, and the European Union.
Although the U.S. funds more money at CERN than any other country, any top-secret weapon research and development is not U.S. proprietary. It is shared with U.S. enemies around the world and U.S. taxpayers are paying to support the international military-industrial war business.
The Politics – The Lombard bankers who financed the crusades, the East India Company, the Dutch East India Company, the British East Indian Company, and the central banks of Italy, Germany, Holland and England, are centered in Geneva. Members of these old banking families have led CERN since its inception. Even though 95% of the supposed CERN tunnels are in France, Geneva is in full control of CERN finances. A complete audit of CERN is not possible because of secretive Swiss banking laws and regulations.
The Machine – All other atom smashers in the world are either above ground or have continuous ground level access points around the circle or tunnels. CERN is conveniently “hidden” 575 feet underground in tunnels that did not upset the landscape while being built or in operation. Where were the environmentalists and concerned citizens while CERN built this underground behemoth? Where are the pictures of the vast amounts of dirt that had to be excavated?
Frankly, when we lived in Boston during the “big dig” it was impossible not to see traffic congestion, cost overruns, corruption, and lots of trucks, construction workers, and dirt. We simply can’t find anything on the internet regarding the construction of tunnels at CERN which is by far a bigger project than anything of its kind—ever.
There do seem to be periodic access points at seven locations for the CERN machine. Each location has an elevator that goes down to the underground facilities where large machines connect to the supposed 17 mile long rings on three different levels. But where are the construction pictures showing the tunnel excavation machines? It would be impossible to dig the tunnels without large construction equipment being seen in the access areas.
What we are shown on the Internet and on CERN’s website are pictures of the so-called underground chambers where different large machines have been built. But since we can’t find any evidence that anything was actually built underground, we have to question the huge and costly experiments taking place at CERN, which, as you will read later, have few tangible results. And really, folks, we all know how easy it is today to photoshop anything—including glossy pictures of the octopus looking CERN and its underground tunnels.
And now we learn that CERN wishes to enlarge its facility by creating an atom smasher ten times bigger than the current ones. Switzerland will be the exclusive recipient of the funds that will be ten times greater than the already existing CERN costs, which is the most expensive scientific research in history. American taxpayers: Can you spell S-U-C-K-E-R-S?
The new, ten-times-bigger ring will be tunneled under Lake Geneva and the surrounding area, one of the most expensive and exclusive areas in Europe, and yet no one has objected to living on top of the most radical and dangerous science experiments in history, not to mention the environmental issues in excavating the beautiful Swiss countryside. Perhaps the locals know that CERN is a hoax, that they are not in danger, and (sorry to be so cynical) they are being compensated for their silent participation. Sort of like the paid crisis actors that we find in other false flags events.
CERN Data is Flawed According to the NSA
CERN claims to have found the Higgs Boson particle called the God Particle. This data is now questionable and seems to be propaganda based upon an inadequate theory. This coincides with the charges made by the National Security Agency and researchers at other accelerators that CERN data does not fit in with the standard models.
It appears that CERN data is simply computer simulations of fake experiments that do not match the data from other legitimate accelerators around the world.
In an article entitled: NSA Concerned: CERN’s Data the Only Ones They Cannot Make Sense Of, from February 4, 2014, we read that:
NSA officials are increasingly concerned about the fact that they cannot understand the data produced by the Large Hadron Collider at the European Organization for Nuclear Research CERN.
“We can’t see any of those W-bosons, Higgs-bosons, or top quarks these folks claim to have detected. Instead all this appears to be an unintelligible mess that shows up when one crashes highly energetic particles at random.”
According to rumors, NSA director Keith B. Alexander is very upset about “particle geeks with a damn high income” that are “unable to explain the meaning of their business to anybody else.”
CERN management stated that
“The entire physics community trusts the results because an unprecedented number of experts believe them. We are astonished that NSA is so distrustful.”
Via unofficial channels, CERN assured that none of the particle physics experiments have developed anything useful, let alone anything harmful, in the past few decades.
Do You Sense a False Flag Here?
In article entitled False Flags are Legal Propaganda Produced by the Department of Defense, we described the twelve indicators of a false flag. The list is easy to use and we suggested that patriots become acquainted with this list (provided by Wikipedia) so that suspicious events and activities could be checked against the indicators.
Is CERN a False Flag Operation?
What is so astonishing is that CERN tells you on its own website what you need to look for in order to discern an internet hoax. (Since CERN is the creator of the internet—which you will read on down the article—guess they needed to alert you when you might be caught up in an Internet fraud.)
CERN indicates three things that will tip you off to an internet fraud or hoax:
- Technical sounding language.
- Credibility by association.
- Life or death questions concerning a human.
As you can see, CERN meets this criteria exactly. What project is more technical than CERN? It continuously creates new theoretical particles that no one, even the NSA, can “find.”
CERN is the largest scientific collaboration in the world. Therefore, its credibility by association is unparalleled with 25,000 top scientists working for it. That many scientists can’t be wrong, says the new alternative method of scientist research—scientific consensus.
What could be more life-threatening than opening black holes that could swallow the earth or finding anti-matter that destroys the entire Earth in the process?
Therefore, CERN, by its own definition of a hoax is a hoax of mega proportion. And it meets all the criteria for twelve basic strategies of perception management.
The True Mission of CERN – Better Bombs
For the first time in history mad scientists have built a machine/weapon that, they claim, is capable of destroying the planet. Hadron colliders, which are actually real mechanical devices, evolved during the cold war to create small nuclear explosions which could be used by the military as a sample of future nuclear bombs. After the cold war ended, Russia and America put an end to the astronomical costs of those machine-weapons, but Europe, with the new ‘marketing’ of ‘peaceful use’ took the industry of accelerators a step further.
The result, they claim, is a 7 teravolt, superconductive, superfluid ‘quark cannon’ which purports to mass together the densest, most attractive substance of the universe, quarks, to explore the formation of quark-gluon liquids. These liquids are the explosives responsible for cosmic annihilations, such as novas, super-novas and perhaps the hypothetical big bang of the universe. Because the Swiss device is supposed to be so large it has the name LARGE Hadron Collider (LHC).
Even though we have not found sufficient evidence that these experiments are actually possible or that CERN is actually doing them, we are concerned about the cavalier acceptance that a body of international physicists could be permitted to conduct such dangerous experiments with dire consequences for humanity, without approval by the United States Congress and other individual nation states (not the collective UN body, but individual, sovereign nation states) and that the world’s citizenry isn’t made more aware of what is actually going on. It seems that there is a scheme to make the LHC a machine that is “too big to fail,” defended by technocrats, nuclear industries, physicists and the corporate press, with the same zeal they defended nuclear weapons during the cold war and big banks in current times.
CERN claims that the LHC has enough potency to create strangelets, a strange liquid explosive that is responsible for the ice-9 reaction that converts stars into super-novas with a device called Castor, a strangelet detector which was built to study them. The ‘Castor Team’ affirms the LHC will ‘likely’ create stable strangelets. CERN will shoot bullets at the speed of light at lead pellets in this superconductive, superfluid cannon. According to the most advanced theoretical research on the subject, they can create strangelets that would sink the earth into a rock of a few kilometers of diameter. Once upon a time, this strange liquid might have been called snake oil.
If all of this were to be believed, CERN would be developing the most powerful weapon ever known to man and many lesser, but dangerous, weapons could arise from these experiments. Thank goodness we now know these scientists as modern-day snake oil hustlers.
Refuting the Big Bang Theory
Everything done at CERN hangs on a “belief” in the big bang theory of creation. The big bang, much like the Santa Claus hypothesis, no longer makes testable predictions wherein proponents agree that a failure would falsify the hypothesis. Instead, the theory is continually amended to account for all new, unexpected discoveries. Indeed, many young scientists now think of this as a normal process in science, just as consensus has replaced the scientific method!
In the time of Galileo and Isaac Newton, anyone who tried to say the earth was not flat or that the sun did not rotate around the earth was not only called a “conspiracy theorist,” but was jailed and even executed. It’s hardly much different now.
Today, the Big Bang is pushed so vehemently, especially among higher education, that anyone who questions its validity, even in light of the countless flaws of the big bang theory, can be subject to intense criticism, professionally and socially ostracized and rejected, given failing grades, and expelled from universities.
The questioning scientist can have his/her professional licenses revoked, professional associations withheld, job terminated, and reputation ruined. All because the inquiring scientist went against the prevailing notions.
It’s no different from the times when people went against the idea the earth was round. It’s not about what is true. It’s about what the educational and governing authorities say they want you to believe and say is true. As a result, almost all professors and scientists are too afraid of being ostracized from their communities and face losing their jobs to speak out against the preposterous “science”.
If you want to believe in the big bang theory, you must believe it one of three ways: by faith, by ignorance, or by indoctrination.
By faith, because you can’t believe something which does not have adequate scientific evidence except as a philosophical viewpoint.
By ignorance because the only way to be certain in your mind that the big bang theory could work is because you don’t have all the facts.
Or if you have been so far indoctrinated you haven’t made a logical conclusion with your own rational mind, you may have never even tried to question what you have been told.
However you must decide for yourself what you will believe. If you decide to believe in the big bang theory, just realize that since it is not supported by science; you have to believe it as a philosophical viewpoint, not as a scientific fact.
Yet the foundational science of CERN, and all of the trillions that will be going into supporting this dark behemoth for decades to come, is based upon the questionable theory of the big bang.
Ten Basic Reasons the Big Bang Theory is Impossible
Granted, we are not trained physicists or highly-paid university researchers. We are regular citizens, with average intelligences, using basic high school science principals to understand what CERN claims to do. And if we see this many holes in their highfalutin science, then why aren’t they seeing it? Or better yet, we challenge any scientist to refute these points with readers of this website.
Here are the questions we would like some of these 25,000 highly educated scientists to clear up for us before we send you another billion dollars:
- If the big bang theory were true, a magnetic monopole should be one of the most prevalent (common) particles in the universe. However, instead it is the complete opposite – a magnetic monopole has never been observed.
- The curvature of matter and energy in regards to density remains very small so the probability that a big bang could have occurred to create the current universe is so astronomically slim that it is entirely improbable.
- If the big bang occurred 13.7 billion years ago, then the deeper we peer into the universe, the closer to the Big bang that we should see. However, no matter how deep we peer into space, still we see no evidence of a big bang.
- For a big bang to have occurred, galaxies would be perfectly evenly spread out. Thus, the lack of universal galactic uniformity contradicts the fundamental aspects of the big bang theory.
- The curvature of matter and energy in regards to density remains very small so the probability that a big bang could have occurred to create the current universe is so astronomically slim that it is entirely improbable.
- Dark Matter and Dark Energy have never been proven, or observed in any way whatsoever, yet the big bang theory depends on the existence of such potentially mythological substances. In order for the big bang theory to even be valid, dark matter and dark energy would have to be the most abundant things in the universe.
- Big bang theorists have tried to use a magical effect called “inflation” to solve several of the obvious problems, including the Horizon Problem and the Flatness Problem. Inflation states that after the big bang, all the particles in the universe traveled faster than the speed of light. But Einstein’s General Law of Relativity proves that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.
- For the big bang to have happened and created the whole universe as we know it, the opposite thing would have happened: all matter would have moved toward order. This is impossible.
- Newton’s First Law of Thermodynamics states generally that matter cannot be created nor destroyed. This is a fundamental law of science which says that matter can only be converted into other matter. Proponents of the big bang theory try to say that the universe was created out of nothing. Obviously this is scientifically impossible.
- The big bang theory opposes Occam’s Razor because it can only exist with innumerable adjustable parameters.
- The universe is too big to have formed in only 10-20 billion years as the big bang theory suggests, since the big bang is theorized to have happened only about 13.7 billion years ago. This is because the speed of matter is limited by the speed of light. The problem here is that if the big bang had occurred, firstly the universe is too large to have only happened 13.7 billion years ago, and secondly there is temperature uniformity which requires matter to have moved beyond the speed of light to become universally uniform. This of course, is impossible according to Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, because nothing can move faster than the speed of light.
Perhaps never in the history of science has so much quality evidence accumulated against a model so widely accepted within a field. If our limited high school science background can question this, why aren’t more university professors calling out the HOAX OF ALL TIME.
Even the most basic elements of the theory, the expansion of the universe and the fireball remnant radiation, remain interpretations with credible alternative explanations, one must wonder why, in this circumstance, that four good alternative models are not even being comparatively discussed by most astronomers. These four alternatives are:
(1) The Steady-State model of the universe suggests the universe always had and will always have the same density. The theory reconciles the apparent evidence that the universe is expanding by suggesting that the universe generates matter at a rate proportionate to the universe’s rate of expansion.
(2) The Ekpyrotic model suggests our universe is the result of a collision of two three-dimensional worlds on a hidden fourth dimension. It doesn’t conflict with the big bang theory completely, as after a certain amount of time it aligns with the events described in the big bang theory.
(3) The big bounce theory suggests our universe is one of a series of universes that first expand, then contract again. The cycle repeats after several billion years.
(4) Plasma cosmology attempts to describe the universe in terms of the electrodynamic properties of the universe. Plasma is an ionized gas, which means it’s a gas with free roaming electrons that can conduct electricity.
NEWS FLASH: CERN Did Not Discover the Higgs Boson Particle
In an article by Jim Algar of Tech Times we read that:
The elusive Higgs boson, the so-called “God particle,” may not have been discovered despite claims of it being detected, some scientists are saying. Particle physicists at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) announced two years ago they had discovered the Higgs particle, considered the foundation particle in the Standard Model of Particle physics, and a Nobel Prize was awarded to Peter Higgs and Francois Englert for their work on the theory of the Higgs boson.
Now, though, researchers at the University of Southern Denmark’s Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics Phenomenology suggest that while the CERN scientists did discover a unique new particle, there’s no conclusive evidence of it being the Higgs boson.
The Higgs could explain data obtained by CERN scientists using the Large Hadron Collider, but other particles could have created the data, suggesting there might be alternate explanations for it, they say in a paper published in the journal Physical Review:
“The current data is not precise enough to determine exactly what the particle is,” says university researcher Mads Toudal Frandsen. “It could be a number of other known particles.”
So what is CERN Really Doing?
In 1989, under the guidance of Tim Berners-Lee, CERN began the World Wide Web project, which led to the first webpage in history. On April 30, 1993, CERN announced that the World Wide Web would be free to anyone. Essentially, CERN wrote the base code for individuals to access the internet.
The first packet-switched computer network was the ARPANET. It used a backbone of routers called Interface Message Processors. Other packet-switched computer networks began to proliferate in the 1970s, eventually adopting TCP/IP protocols or being replaced by newer networks. The National Science Foundation created NSFNET in 1986 by funding six networking sites using links and peering to the ARPANET. In 1987, this new network was upgraded with links to thirteen sites.
These sites included regional networks that in turn connected over 170 other networks. IBM, MCI and Merit upgraded the backbone bandwidth (T3) in 1991. The combination of the ARPANET and NSFNET became known as the Internet. Within a few years, the dominance of the NSFNet backbone led to the decommissioning of the redundant ARPANET infrastructure in 1990.
In the early days of the internet, backbone providers exchanged their traffic at government-sponsored Network Access Points (NAPs), until the government privatized the internet, and transferred the NAPs to commercial providers.
A Network Access Point (NAP) is a public network exchange facility where internet service providers (ISPs) connected with one another in peering arrangements. The NAPs were a key component in the transition from the 1990s NSFNET era (when many networks were government sponsored and commercial traffic was prohibited) to the commercial Internet providers of today.
The four Network Access Points (NAPs) were defined under the U.S. National Information Infrastructure (NII) document as transitional data communications facilities at which Network Service Providers (NSPs) would exchange traffic, in replacement of the publicly financed NSFNET Internet backbone. The original four NAPs are in Washington, D.C., New York, Chicago, and California.
As a transitional strategy, NAPs were effective, giving commercial network operators a bridge from the internet’s beginnings as a government-funded academic experiment, to the modern internet of many private-sector competitors collaborating to form a network-of-networks, anchored around Internet Exchange Points.