Putin’s Explosive Declaration: “The previous U.S. elections were rigged through mail voting.” (video)
Medeea Greere, an independent publisher, is now on Telegram at https://t.me/AMGNEWS2022 and exists only on reader support as we publish Truth, Freedom and Love for public awareness. Thank You for your support!
Russian President Vladimir Putin has set the political world ablaze with his explosive declaration: “The previous U.S. elections were rigged through mail voting.” As the dust settles, it becomes imperative to dissect this contentious issue that has long lurked in the shadows of American democracy. Brace yourselves, as we embark on an eye-opening journey into the heart of the mail-in voting controversy, exploring claims of fraud, expert opinions, and the seismic impact on the 2020 election.
The 2020 U.S. Presidential election witnessed unprecedented changes in the way Americans voted. Universal mail-in voting, a practice banned in most developed nations, emerged as a contentious focal point, generating waves of debate and skepticism. In this in-depth exploration, we delve into Putin’s startling assertion, backed by historical context, expert opinions, and its pivotal role in shaping the political landscape.
Mail-In Voting: A Controversial Terrain
Mail-in voting has always been a topic of contention, with critics raising concerns about the potential for fraud. Putin’s recent statement adds fuel to this already blazing fire, alleging that the previous U.S. elections were rigged through mail voting. Let’s examine the evidence, starting with the 2005 Federal Election Reform Commission chaired by former President Jimmy Carter.
2005: The Carter Commission’s Alarming Findings
In 2005, the Federal Election Reform Commission, led by one of America’s most respected statesmen, former President Jimmy Carter, published its findings on absentee ballots. The commission’s conclusion was nothing short of alarming:
“Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”
This statement sent shockwaves through the American political establishment, prompting a deeper examination of the mail-in voting process.
2012: The New York Times Weighs In
Fast forward to 2012, when The New York Times, a beacon of American journalism, weighed in on the issue. In a striking headline, the newspaper asserted, “All the evidence of stolen elections involves absentee ballots.” This was a clarion call for scrutiny, as experts and observers began to focus on the vulnerability of mail-in ballots in the electoral process.
2016: Slate’s Game-Changing Revelation
In 2016, Slate, a reputable online magazine, dropped a bombshell with its article titled, “The only voting fraud schemes with the potential to actually swing elections involved mail-in ballots.” The words “swing elections” resonated with Americans, underscoring the pivotal role of mail-in voting in determining electoral outcomes.
2020: The Pandemic Catalyst
As the world grappled with the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the political establishment and the left seized the moment to push for universal mail-in voting. This move resulted in an astronomical increase in the number of ballots cast by mail, skyrocketing from 28.8 million in 2016 to a staggering 66.4 million in 2020. The United States stood alone among developed nations in its embrace of universal mail-in voting, raising questions about the potential consequences.
“Crime of the Century”: Big Pharma Doesn’t Want You to Know About Alternative: How to Make Natural Morphine At Home Using This Powerful Medicinal Plant
The Impact of Universal Mail-In Voting
Universal mail-in voting, while advocated as a safety measure during the pandemic, fundamentally changed the outcome of the 2020 election. In an era where trust in the electoral process is paramount, concerns over the legitimacy of mail-in ballots persist. This seismic shift in voting methods left many Americans questioning the sanctity of their democracy.
Examining the Controversy: Expert Opinions
To fully understand the gravity of Putin’s declaration, it’s essential to consider expert opinions on mail-in voting and the potential for fraud. While proponents argue that mail-in voting is secure and accessible, skeptics point to the vulnerabilities in the system.
Proponents of Mail-In Voting
Proponents argue that mail-in voting expands access to the ballot box, particularly for individuals who face physical barriers to voting in person. They maintain that the process is secure, with safeguards in place to verify voter identities and prevent fraud. Furthermore, they assert that mail-in voting played a pivotal role in ensuring voter safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Skeptics and Their Concerns
On the other side of the debate, skeptics raise legitimate concerns about the integrity of mail-in voting. They argue that the absence of in-person supervision and the potential for ballot harvesting create opportunities for fraud. Furthermore, critics point to instances of mishandling and lost mail-in ballots, questioning the reliability of the system.
The Impact of Universal Mail-In Voting on the 2020 Election
The 2020 U.S. Presidential election will be remembered for its high-stakes drama, fierce partisanship, and the significant role of universal mail-in voting. As millions of Americans cast their ballots by mail, the impact on the electoral outcome became a subject of intense scrutiny.
Claims of Irregularities
Allegations of irregularities in the 2020 election emerged, with some pointing to mail-in voting as a potential source of concern. Claims of unverified signatures, improperly processed ballots, and alleged ballot harvesting efforts further fueled the controversy.
Legal Challenges and Investigations
The aftermath of the 2020 election saw numerous legal challenges and investigations aimed at addressing perceived issues with mail-in voting. While some cases were dismissed, others led to changes in election procedures and heightened scrutiny of mail-in ballots.
Mail-In Voting: An International Perspective
It’s essential to contextualize the mail-in voting debate within an international framework. The United States’ embrace of universal mail-in voting sets it apart from most developed nations. Many countries have implemented stringent regulations to safeguard the integrity of their electoral processes, providing valuable insights into potential improvements in the U.S. system.
Comparing the United States’ approach to mail-in voting with that of other developed nations reveals significant disparities. Countries like Australia and the United Kingdom have implemented strict controls, requiring voters to provide valid reasons for absentee ballots. This approach aims to balance accessibility with the need for security.
International examples also showcase various strategies for addressing vulnerabilities in mail-in voting. Enhanced signature verification, secure ballot drop-off locations, and comprehensive tracking systems have been employed to minimize the risk of fraud while preserving accessibility.
Putin’s Declaration Ignites the Mail-In Voting Debate
Vladimir Putin’s explosive declaration regarding mail-in voting fraud in previous U.S. elections has thrust this contentious issue back into the spotlight. With a history of concerns dating back to the 2005 Carter Commission, reinforced by media reports in 2012 and 2016, the debate over mail-in voting’s security and reliability continues.
The dramatic rise of universal mail-in voting in 2020, driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, left a lasting impact on the American electoral landscape. While proponents argue for increased accessibility, skeptics remain wary of potential vulnerabilities.
As the United States navigates its path forward, it must consider international best practices, expert opinions, and the lessons learned from the 2020 election to ensure a transparent and secure electoral process. The debate surrounding mail-in voting is far from over, and it remains a critical topic for the future of American democracy.