A Supreme Court Case Regarding The 2020 Election Just Hit The Docket
> It involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress.
> This action is against 388 federal officers in their official capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence (“Respondents”)
> Also, it is about the congress ignoring over one hundred claimants, on J6, that the election was rigged. They did not investigate the claim, as they should have, and installed Biden. Under the constitution this is treasonous, as they were aiding the enemy.
> When the allegations of a rigged election came forward the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office.
Check the document for the full list. CLICK HERE
BOOM! Make Trump The King Of White Palace Again! Makes a GREAT Gifts for Your Trump Supporting Friends and Family! 3 Chic Gifts Every Host Will Appreciate This Thanksgiving And Christmas!
Copyright Infringement: Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (“DMCA”)
November 15, 2022 © US and EU all rights reserved. Permission to use this article in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its source at American Media Group.
Medeea Greere, an independent publisher, is now on Telegram at https://t.me/AMGNEWS2022 and exists only on reader support as we publish Truth, Freedom and Love for public awareness. Thank You for your support!
Pingback: Restored Republic via a GCR as of November 18, 2022 - American Media Group
Pingback: Restored Republic via a GCR as of November 18, 2022 – altnews.org
Pingback: 2020 Election Fraud and National Security Breach Case No. 22-380 now on the the U.S. Supreme Court docket - Dr. Rich Swier
Pingback: 2020 Election Fraud and National Security Breach Case No. 22-380 now on the the U.S. Supreme Court docket (Case No. 22-380) – The Trailblazing Patriot
Judy Byington uses Real Raw News as a legitimate source when it is a SATIRE site. This is their disclaimer under ‘about us’ on their webpage: “Disclaimer:
Information on this website is for informational and educational and entertainment purposes. This website contains humor, parody, and satire.”
She will put anything in print regardless of source, she will pedal it as genuine when clearly it is not. She loves to use past tense verbiage when speaking of a future event. It changes the meaning. Let me give you an example from today’s post. Example: “In the next three weeks 86 countries were set to be under Martial Law. …Charlie Ward on Thurs. 17 2022.” Were?
So does this mean that the plans for Martial Law have been cancelled since they “were” going to do this in three weeks?
What in the Hell is wrong her? Why can’t she say, “In the next three weeks 86 countries are set to be under Martial Law. …Charlie Ward on Thurs. 17 2022?” I read her book review and she received terrible reviews. She desperately needs a proofreader. She doesn’t have one, she would probably drive them crazy!