BREAKING: Wall Street and Regional Banks Scramble for New Funds as the FED Ends Emergency Lending Program, Aimed at Keeping Failing Banks Afloat During Banking Collapse
Medeea Greere, an independent publisher, is now on Telegram at https://t.me/AMGNEWS2022 and exists only on reader support as we publish Truth, Freedom and Love for public awareness. Thank You for your support!
The reverberations are felt across the financial spectrum as the Federal Reserve abruptly ends its lifeline to struggling banks, leaving Wall Street giants and regional players grappling with an uncertain future. With the safety net pulled, the scene resembles a financial Wild West, where survival of the fittest becomes the mantra. In this high-stakes game, every move is scrutinized, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. Join us as we delve into the heart of this unprecedented turmoil and explore the ramifications of this seismic shift in the financial landscape.
Chapter 1: The FED’s Shockwave: Closing the Emergency Lending Spigot
With the stroke of a pen, the Federal Reserve has sent shockwaves through the financial world, closing the taps on its emergency lending program. Designed as a last resort to keep failing banks afloat during times of crisis, this program has been a critical lifeline since its inception. However, with signs of economic recovery on the horizon, the FED has deemed it fit to pull the plug, triggering a cascade of uncertainty and fear.
Chapter 2: Wall Street on Edge: Titans in Turmoil
For the Wall Street titans accustomed to riding the waves of financial volatility, the FED’s decision comes as a rude awakening. Suddenly stripped of their safety net, these giants find themselves navigating treacherous waters, where one wrong move could spell disaster. With profits at stake and reputations on the line, every decision becomes a high-stakes gamble, as they scramble to secure new funds and shore up their defenses against the looming storm.
Chapter 3: Regional Banks in Crisis: David vs. Goliath
While the spotlight often shines brightest on Wall Street’s behemoths, it’s the regional banks that often bear the brunt of financial turmoil. For these smaller players, the FED’s decision is nothing short of a crisis, as they find themselves thrust into a battle for survival against the backdrop of economic uncertainty. With limited resources and less room for error, these David’s of the financial world must now find creative ways to weather the storm and emerge unscathed on the other side.
Chapter 4: Economic Fallout: Dominoes in Motion
As Wall Street and regional banks alike brace for impact, the economic fallout of the FED’s decision reverberates far and wide. From Main Street to corporate boardrooms, the effects are felt in every corner of the economy. With access to credit drying up and liquidity becoming scarce, businesses face an uphill battle to stay afloat, while consumers grapple with the prospect of job losses and financial insecurity. In this turbulent landscape, uncertainty reigns supreme, as the dominoes of economic collapse threaten to topple at any moment.
Chapter 5: Navigating Uncertain Waters: Strategies for Survival
In the face of such unprecedented turmoil, navigating the waters of the financial world requires a steady hand and a clear strategy. For Wall Street titans and regional banks alike, survival hinges on adaptability and resilience. From diversifying funding sources to tightening risk controls, the path forward may be fraught with challenges, but it’s not insurmountable. By embracing innovation and staying ahead of the curve, institutions can weather the storm and emerge stronger on the other side.
Emergency Fed bank effort ends lending, as eyes turn to discount window
(Reuters) – A Federal Reserve facility launched in haste a year ago amid the heavy stress triggered by Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse closes for new business on Monday, amid evidence it helped turn the tide of trouble that risked derailing the economy and upending the central bank’s efforts to lower inflation.
A year after the Bank Term Funding Program was unveiled on a Sunday afternoon — when regulators feared a systemwide bank run might unfold the next day — deposits have stabilized, bank loan books overall are growing, no bank of meaningful size has failed in 10 months, and the Fed was not forced to change its monetary policy footing.
The program “certainly worked” given the rebound of the banking sector, said Steven Kelly, associate director of research at the Yale School of Management’s Program on Financial Stability.
But the sunset of new lending at the BTFP is raising questions about how the central bank will respond to the inevitable return one day of banking trouble. Kelly and others think the Fed would not want to go down this route again if it could avoid it. That’s bringing fresh attention to the Fed’s discount window, its long-running and often shunned bank lending facility, seen as the lender of last resort.
WARNING: The Vatican’s Hidden Secret Revealed: ‘The Divine Prayer – A One-Minute Miracle for Texan Patriots, All Americans, Our Heroes, and President Trump – May God Bless America!’ VIDEO BELOW
The BTFP tackled a liquidity crunch after the world’s first social media-induced bank run put SVB out of business in a matter of days, with a clutch of other banks failing in its wake. To ensure deposit-taking banks could get the money they needed, the BTFP offered loans on eligible collateral without the penalties usually imposed by Fed emergency lending, doing so on relatively cheap terms.
That configuration generated large amounts of borrowing even when the most acute phase of the crisis was in the rear view mirror. Jumps in borrowing at the discount window last spring quickly abated to normal levels while BTFP borrowing ground ever higher as banks appeared to be exploiting its low rate relative to other sources of short-term funding.
In late January the Fed shut down that arbitrage play, and new loans have all but dried up since, with the facility’s credit outstanding holding at around the $160 billion mark.
‘THE STIGMA PROBLEM’
For all its apparent success, the fact that the BTFP existed at all is an “admission of failure” on the Fed’s part, said Peter Conti-Brown, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. The Fed’s “failure of Discount Window management might have made the Bank Term Funding Program necessary,” Conti-Brown said.
At some level, Fed officials may agree, and are acting to address the situation.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell told senators Thursday “we need to do more to eliminate the stigma problem, and we need to make sure that banks are actually able to use [the Discount Window] when they need to use it.”
Eliminating discount window stigma has been a desire of the Fed for many years. Even as Fed officials encourage its use, large firms remain hesitant, fearing it will signal they are in trouble. They also worry the borrowing would invite regulators to have a closer look at them.
Some experts reckon stigma fears can be reduced by the Fed tolerating notable levels of borrowing in otherwise placid times. Some also believe that as the Fed moves toward pushing bank preparedness to use the discount window, stigma could be further reduced by allowing this type of liquidity to factor into bank stress-testing scenarios.
“The Fed recognizes that it needs to fix the profound stigma associated with using the window that’s largely the fault of the Fed itself,” said Bill Nelson, a former top Fed staffer who now serves as chief economist at the Bank Policy Institute, a lobbying group.
The Fed seems committed to fixing the situation and it appears the Fed is conveying discount window usage is “just a business decision on the part of the banks” and “a willingness to use it is a good thing for the financial system, not a bad thing,” Nelson said.
Amid that reform process, banks may lean into funding from the Federal Home Loan Banks, Bank of America analysts said in a research note Friday. Loans from the BTFP could be taken in terms of up to a year and it’s unclear how quickly some of that borrowing will roll off and if affected banks will need to replace it, possibly via the FHLB banks, the researchers said.
‘ROOM TO MANEUVER’
One other benefit of the BTFP relates to the Fed’s work to lower inflation. The Fed started raising rates in March 2022 and it was even able to push through an increase last March, just 10 days after launching the BTFP, with no guarantee then it would help avert a wider crisis.
In the view of New York Fed President John Williams, that’s because the Fed’s efforts last spring allowed them a luxury not often available in the past: To conduct financial stability and monetary policy work separately, rather than forcing a trade off between the two.
The Fed was “able to do exactly what you want to do in the textbook: You apply liquidity policies, you apply resolution solutions…We did that with discount window kind of programs” and other regulatory actions, which left “monetary policy the room to maneuver,” Williams said Friday in an appearance in London.
(Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Dan Burns and Chizu Nomiyama)
